<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ordinals &amp; Runes: Are They Clogging the Network or Fueling Innovation?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Bitcoin isn't just for payments anymore. The Ordinals protocol allows for NFTs ("inscriptions"), and the new Runes protocol enables fungible tokens directly on Bitcoin. This is driving record-high transaction fees and heated debate.</p>
<p dir="auto">Love it or hate it, the Ordinals and Runes phenomena have brought unprecedented activity to the Bitcoin blockchain. After the halving, fees briefly spiked to over $100 as users rushed to mint tokens.</p>
<p dir="auto">Proponents argue this is a vibrant new use case that increases miner revenue and security post-halving. Critics say it clogs the network for regular transactions and deviates from Satoshi's peer-to-peer electronic cash vision.</p>
<p dir="auto">Discussion Starters:</p>
<ul>
<li>Is this a healthy evolution for Bitcoin or spam?</li>
<li>Can the Lightning Network alleviate fee pressure for small payments?</li>
<li>Do you see long-term value in Bitcoin-based NFTs and tokens?</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://coinsori.com/topic/53/ordinals-runes-are-they-clogging-the-network-or-fueling-innovation</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 22:33:08 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://coinsori.com/topic/53.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:26:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>